As the winds of time blow over our heads at the warp speed of the Starship Enterprise, it remains difficult
to fathom that the world-wide Class of 1969 entered high school fifty years ago
this coming August or September. Fifty
years ago in most cases we shyly and cautiously entered
that next big stage of our lives. We may
have been real hot shots in the 8th grade, but now we were bottom
feeders in an aquarium filled with sharks swimming much higher up in the water column.
Looking back at my background, I can think of so many
things that happened in those four years that shaped and continue to shape my
life. Many of us lost our virginity in
high school (and those of us who didn’t certainly wished we had). Many of us smoked our first cigarette in
high school and some of us while sitting in his black 1965 Ford Mustang in the parking lot of the Catholic school smoked our first joint in high school. We earned letters in various sports in high
school, and excelled at debate or theater in high school, and most of us also learned how to better socialize in high school, while some of us may have accidently dunked David Hennekens' head in the toilet and kept flushing it over and over one day in high school. Three of us even learned how to break into the Omaha Bar in the early hours of an April morning and steal a
six-pack of Pabst Blue Ribbon while we were in high school. Most importantly, however, we learned
much about how to survive in high school.
Despite our best efforts to the contrary, we all left high
school with more knowledge than we ever thought possible to absorb. For the Valedictorians and the Salutatorians absorbing knowledge came
easily. However for others that
absorption rate was akin to watching molasses flow in a January blizzard. Much of our collective success in knowledge
absorption can be traced back to a teacher or to teachers who remain memorable
for many reasons and some of them still loom large in our thinking even today.
William Transburg
was my 9th grade Biology teacher.
He and his wife (whose name I forget now) used to take me with them on
winter and early spring weekend days and we would go seining for fish and other
aquatic life in streams, and looking for birds in the forests of Barron County,
Wisconsin. Those experiences cemented my
passion for being a biologist and because Transburg went to the University of
Wisconsin – River Falls for his biology degree, I decided I would do the
same. And I did.
Arlen Mortensen
was my 10th grade World History teacher. Although it was difficult for anyone to admit
they liked history, Arlen was so good at teaching it that a deep-seated
interest in history was spawned that remains with me today. I busted my ass in his class and thought I
had earned an A each quarter. Arlen’s
grade book however showed instead that I earned four B+’s. I often wonder if I could talk to him today
and convince him to change those grades almost 50 years after the fact.
Orv Olson was
my 11th grade Geometry teacher.
Try as he might Orv could not get the Pythagorean theorem or any other
concept of math to sink into my thick skull.
I once took a 200 point tests of his and scored 4 points on it. I could
not even guess the true-false questions correctly. After that he warned me if I did not improve
I would fail the semester. I failed the
semester. Several years later after
earning my Bachelor’s Degree I returned home to show my diploma to Orv. When he asked what I majored in I told him
Geology and Biology and added “with minors in physics and in math.” It was true, I had a double minor in physics
and in math and when Orv heard that I thought his head was going to spin around
like the little girl’s did in the movie “The
Exorcist.”
Orvin "Spot" Olson was my geometry teacher in high school. Try as he might he could not get me to understand basic principles and theorums of mathematics. Scoring 4 points on a 200 point test was one example of how hopeless it was to try teaching me geometry. This image is photographed from the 1969 edition of "Aurora" the Rice Lake Senior High School annual.
Delores O’Brien
was my 12th grade College Preparatory English teacher. On the first day of her class Mrs. O’Brien
said to me very snidely “What are you doing in a college prep class?” (She put
special emphasis on the word “you”).
When I told her I was going to River Falls to be a biologist she said “Only
if you pass my class.” It was a veiled
threat and warning all wrapped in one.
Once I picked up The Catcher in
the Rye from the back of her room and told her I wanted to read it because
“this must be a baseball book.” She
shook her head and said, “You big dummy. That book has NOTHING to do with
baseball.” The only thing I liked about
Mrs. O’Brien was her daughter Maureen after whom I lusted many many times while
walking behind her down a school hallway between classes.
With considerable resignation in her voice, Mrs. O'Brien was the one who informed me that The Catcher in the Rye was not, in fact, a book about baseball
Despite the hate-hate relationship that Mrs. O’Brien and
I developed and nurtured from the first day of class until the end of the
school year, she taught me to have a deep and abiding respect for the English
language, and the proper use of its many words and phrases. And that brings us to the point of this
article.
It was because of Mrs. O’Brien and her dogged pursuit of
perfection in English that when it came time seven years later to write the
thesis for my Master’s degree, it went through only one re-write before my
graduate committee approved my work. My
major professor was so impressed that he asked me where I learned how to use
English so well. I told him about a crabby English teacher in high school
whose daughter I still enjoyed occasional fantasies. When I started writing papers for publication
in scientific journals I used the techniques of proper word usage and conjugation
taught to me by Mrs. O’Brien and rarely if ever did a journal editor return a
manuscript with anything other than superficial changes to meet his or her
writing style.
In 1969 the preposition “like” was not used as filler nearly
as often as it is today. Now, however,
it is used so often that it has become nearly an everyday form of speaking. An
online dictionary defines “like” as a preposition having the same
characteristics or qualities as "there
were other suits like mine in the shop.
Like can also be
used as an informal conjunction in the same way as. “people change countries like they change clothes"
The dictionary
also recognizes that “like” can be used as an informal adverb used in
speech as a meaningless filler or used to convey a person's reported attitude
or feelings "so she comes into the
room and she's like “Where is everybody?”
It was the use of “like” as meaningless filler that drove
Mrs. O’Brien crazy even before its overuse in contemporary speech. More than once Mrs. O’Brien would call me out
in front of the class and even occasionally slap my fingers with the narrow edge of a ruler when I made the mistake of improperly using “like.” Of course today she and the school district
would be sued for uncountable sums of money if she smacked my hand for any
reason. However it was a lesson well
learned and an excellent technique.
Today when I’m surrounded by people saying “like” as meaningless filler
I begin mocking them repeating “like” each time they say it incorrectly. As I do I try to imagine Mrs. O’Brien
standing over them smacking their fingers with that same god damned ruler with
which she would regularly whack my fingers.
If you were an undergraduate student at the University of
Wisconsin – River Falls in the late 1960s and early 1970s and you wanted to
eventually graduate and receive a diploma, one of the courses you were required
to take was Fundamentals of Speech 130. At the time it was viewed with scorn but as
life has taught me, Speech 130 was
one of the most often used classes throughout my career. My class was taught on the second floor of
rickety old South Hall and my professor (whose name I have forgotten) was a
stickler for the proper use of English in our speeches. She had us present speeches extemporaneously from
subjects she gave us at random while we stood behind her lectern. We gave persuasive speeches and debate
speeches and argumentative speeches (I always received an A on those three) and informative
speeches. Before each speech we were warned
that if we used the word “like” as a filler 1 point would be deducted from our
total grade for each misuse. Thus it was
theoretically possible to receive a negative number for a grade on a speech if
you went wild with the word “like” and filled your speech with it.
The other misused word that drove Mrs. O’Brien bonkers in
high school was “got” and especially when it was used with the contraction I’ve
as in “I’ve got milk.” “I’ve” is a
contraction of the words “I have” so to say “I’ve got…..” is actually saying “I
have got…” Cows produce milk and when
holding a glass of it you ‘have” milk so get over this “got milk” nonsense!
No I do not! Female bovines produce milk and I may occasionally "have" a glass of it in my hand.
Got is the past tense of the word “get” which means
obtaining or possessing something. “Have”
is a verb that means to possess something.
Thus “I have got” is the same thing as saying “I have”….so why add the
second sense of possession? Just say “I
have” and be over with it.
Long ago in high school Mrs. O’Brien used to hound me
when I improperly used “got” in a sentence and I still am aware of it and
frustrated by its improper use today. Much
of the angst being directed at immigrants to the United States by a certain
largely uneducated group of tea drinkers is that immigrants allegedly are unable
to correctly speak and use English in conversations. I often wonder how many of those tea drinkers frequently and incorrectly use words such as “like” and “got” in sentences and
especially when they are discussing immigrants whom they claim don’t know
English!
Comedian and language satirist George Carlin made
millions of dollars from skits and routines about the use (proper or otherwise)
of words in every day conversation. Who
among us of my age group will ever forget Carlin’s famous “Seven Dirty Words” routine
that ultimately was the subject of a court case heard before the United States
Supreme Court. These were seven words
that the Supremes deemed to be indecent and could not be used on public
airwaves although today two of them (piss, tits) are used regularly on
television and radio. Carlin went to
great lengths to lampoon people who improperly and incorrectly used words in
every day speech.
George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" remains a classic
The only person I have ever known who was even more
dogged in their lampooning, at least when it came to me, was Delores O’Brien. If only she could be aware how frequently “like”
and “got” are misused in every day speech, I have a hunch Mrs. O’Brien would be
spinning in her grave at the speed of a Cuisinart.
Being somewhat of a language prude, myself, I thoroughly enjoyed this read--and especially the George Carlin oration.
ReplyDeleteGod bbless
ReplyDelete